Expert Free Picks

[1%] Free Play on Angels under 9 -115

Magic vs Celtics 
5-Unit bet on the Celtics priced as a 14-point favorite. 

Consider betting 5-units on the Celtics preflop and then look to add the remaining 2-Units if the Celtics get priced at 9.5 points during the first half of action.  

Since 2021, this betting algorithm has produced highly profitable results with an eye-popping 26-4 SU and 24-6 ATS record good for 80% winning bets. Bet on hoe favorites that are coming off three consecutive games allowing no more than 105 points in each game and facing a foe that scored 120 or more points in their last game. 

Since 2016, favorites of 7.5 or more points in this situation have gone an impressive 31-3 SU and 23-10-1 ATYS good for 70% winning bets. 

Key Player Matchups 

The Celtics’ star-studded lineup, led by Jayson Tatum, holds significant edges over Orlando’s depleted roster. Here are three pivotal player matchups that could dictate Boston’s path to a sweep: 

Jayson Tatum vs. Paolo Banchero: Duke Duel in the Spotlight 

Why It Matters: Tatum, a 2024 Finals MVP contender, faces his former Duke teammate Banchero, Orlando’s rising star. This matchup pits Boston’s versatile superstar against a young forward tasked with carrying the Magic’s offense. 

Analytics Edge: Tatum averaged 30 points, 8 rebounds, and 5 assists on 45.9% three-point shooting (17-for-37) against Orlando this season, including a 26-point blowout win on January 17. His Player Impact Estimate (PIE) of 18.2 dwarfs Banchero’s 14.5, reflecting Tatum’s two-way dominance. Banchero, who missed time with an oblique injury, averaged 15 points and 6 assists in the April 9 win but struggled (40% FG) against Tatum’s defense. Boston’s 2nd-ranked offensive rating (118.5) thrives when Tatum exploits mismatches, while Orlando’s 27th-ranked offensive rating (108.7) leans heavily on Banchero’s 22.6 points per game. 

Why Celtics Win This: Tatum’s playoff experience (6 conference finals in 8 years) and 37-6 record in games with 36.5%+ team three-point shooting overwhelm Banchero’s 0-2 playoff record. Orlando’s 30th-ranked three-point percentage (31.2%) can’t match Boston’s record-setting 1,457 made threes. If Tatum continues his 48% eFG% against Banchero, Boston cruises. 

Jaylen Brown vs. Franz Wagner: Physicality Meets Uncertainty 

Why It Matters: Brown, despite a lingering knee issue, is Boston’s second scoring option, while Wagner, Orlando’s other young wing, aims to disrupt with physical defense. Brown’s health is a question mark, but his practice participation signals readiness. 

Analytics Edge: Brown averaged 27.5 points, 7.5 rebounds, and 5 assists on 48.8% shooting in two games against Orlando, showcasing his ability to overpower Wagner. Wagner, also recovering from an oblique injury, posted 23 points in the April 9 win but shot 42% overall against Boston. Orlando’s 2nd-ranked defensive rating (108.2) limits three-point attempts (fewest in NBA), but Boston’s 5th-ranked eFG% (.561) and Brown’s 1.3 steals per game exploit Wagner’s 2.1 turnovers. 

Why Celtics Win This: Brown’s 48-14 record as a playoff favorite and Boston’s 54-7 mark when outshooting opponents from three trump Wagner’s 9-12 record in close games. If Brown plays 30+ minutes (as in his 37-point outburst vs. Atlanta), Wagner’s 49% eFG% defense won’tcontain him, setting up a Celtics rout. 

Derrick White vs. Cole Anthony: Backcourt Mismatch 

Why It Matters: With Jalen Suggs out (knee injury), Anthony steps up as Orlando’s lead guard, facing White, Boston’s unsung two-way star. White’s three-point shooting and defense could expose Anthony’s inexperience. 

Analytics Edge: White’s 265 made threes (4th in NBA) and 1.2 steals per game fuel Boston’s 4th-ranked defensive rating (109.8). He averaged 21 points against Orlando, shooting 45% from three. Anthony’s 18 points off the bench in the April 9 win were solid, but his 38% three-point shooting and 3rd-ranked turnover rate (2.8 per game) among Magic starters are liabilities. Orlando’s 28th-ranked points per game (104.2) crumble in clutch situations (30th in clutch FG%), while Boston’s 7-2 clutch record shines. 

Why Celtics Win This: White’s 50.2% eFG% and 2.1 assist-to-turnover ratio outclass Anthony’s 44% eFG% and 1.8 ratio. Boston’s 22-5 post-All-Star run, driven by White’s 39% three-point shooting, buries Orlando’s 9-3 finish, especially without Suggs’ perimeter defense. 

Key Team Matchups 

Boston’s well-rounded roster exploits Orlando’s offensive struggles and injury woes. Here are two critical team matchups that favor the Celtics: 

Boston’s Three-Point Barrage vs. Orlando’s Elite Perimeter Defense 

Why It Matters: Boston set NBA records with 1,457 made threes and 3,955 attempts, ranking 2nd in offensive rating (118.5). Orlando boasts the NBA’s best three-point defense, allowing the fewest attempts and makes, with a 2nd-ranked defensive rating (108.2). 

Analytics Edge: Boston shot 36.5% or better from three in 43 games, going 37-6, including a 17-for-37 (45.9%) performance in their 26-point win over Orlando on January 17. Orlando limited Boston to 15-for-73 (20.5%) in their two wins, but those games lacked Tatum or the full Celtics lineup. The Magic rank last in three-point makes and 30th in three-point percentage (31.2%), while Boston’s 54-7 record when outshooting opponents from three is unmatched. 

Why Celtics Win This: Orlando’s defense relies on physicality, but Boston’s 5th-ranked eFG% (.561) and depth (Tatum, White, Pritchard’s 255 threes) overwhelm. The Magic’s 1.07 points per possession (2nd-worst in NBA) can’t keep pace if Boston hits 36%+ from deep, as in 43 of 82 games. 

Boston’s Playoff Experience vs. Orlando’s Youth and Injuries 

Why It Matters: Boston’s core has reached six conference finals in eight years, going 15-3 in last year’s playoffs. Orlando, with Banchero and Wagner missing significant time and Suggs and Moe Wagner out, lacks playoff pedigree (0-2 in recent postseasons). 

Analytics Edge: Boston’s 61-21 record, 4th-ranked defensive rating (109.8), and 2nd-ranked net rating (+8.7) reflect their consistency. Orlando’s 41-41 record, 27th-ranked offensive rating (108.7), and 28th-ranked points per game (104.2) highlight their struggles. The Magic’s 30th-ranked clutch FG% and 24th-ranked field goal percentage (44.1%) falter against Boston’s 7-2 clutch record and 48.1% field goal percentage (8th in NBA). 

Why Celtics Win This: Boston’s 4-1 first-round record in recent years (four sweeps or five games) and 48-14 favorite record crush Orlando’s 9-12 underdog clip. The Magic’s injuries (Suggs, Moe Wagner) and 15-7 start undone by a .500 finish post-injuriescan’t match Boston’s 22-5 post-All-Star surge. 

Why the Celtics Could Easily Sweep the Magic 

The Celtics are poised for a 4-0 sweep due to overwhelming advantages in talent, experience, and matchup dynamics, supported by analytics and Orlando’s limitations: 

Firepower and Depth: Boston’s record-setting three-point shooting (1,457 makes, 36.8% as a team) and 2nd-ranked offensive rating (118.5) exploit Orlando’s 27th-ranked offensive rating (108.7) and last-place three-point makes. With Tatum, Brown, White, and Pritchard all surpassing 250 threes, Boston’s 37-6 record when shooting 36.5%+ from deep is a death knell for Orlando’s 30th-ranked three-point defense (31.2%). Even if Orlando limits attempts (as in their 15-for-73 defensive wins), Boston’s 45.1% overall FG% against the Magic and 5th-ranked eFG% (.561) ensure scoring efficiency. 

Playoff Pedigree: Boston’s core, with 15-3 playoff wins last season and six conference finals trips, thrives in high-pressure moments (7-2 clutch record). Orlando’s young roster, with Banchero and Wagner at 0-2 in playoffs and no Suggs or Moe Wagner, ranks 28th in clutch points and 30th in clutch FG%. The Celtics’ 4-1 first-round history (sweeps or five games) and 48-14 favorite record dwarf Orlando’s 9-12 underdog struggles. 

Injury and Roster Gaps: Orlando’s season was derailed by injuries to Banchero (oblique), Wagner (oblique), Suggs (knee, out), and Moe Wagner (ACL, out), dropping them from a 15-7 start to .500. Boston, despite Brown’s knee concern, has a healthy Tatum, Porzingis (missed 40 games but ready), and depth (Horford, Pritchard). Brown’s full practice participation and Boston’s 26-point win with their full lineup signal dominance. Orlando’s 1.07 points per possession (2nd-worst) can’t match Boston’s 118.5 points per game (3rd in NBA). 

Historical Precedent: Boston’s 26-point win on January 17 (121-94) with their full lineup exposed Orlando’s inability to counter Boston’s spacing and defense. Orlando’s two wins (108-104, 96-76) came without Tatum or Boston’s top six, rendering them unreliable predictors. The Celtics’ 61-21 record, 22-5 post-All-Star run, and 54-7 mark when outshooting opponents from three contrast sharply with Orlando’s 41-41 record and 9-3 finish against weaker foes. 

Orlando’s Offensive Woes: The Magic’s 28th-ranked points per game (104.2), 24th-ranked FG% (44.1%), and 30th-ranked three-point percentage (31.2%) crumble against Boston’s 4th-ranked defensive rating (109.8) and 1.8 blocks per game (Porzingis, Horford). Orlando’s reliance on Banchero and Wagner (49% of team points) falters against Boston’s 2nd-ranked net rating (+8.7) and White’s 1.2 steals. 

Potential Obstacles to a Sweep 

While a sweep is likely, two factors could extend the series: 

Jaylen Brown’s Knee: Brown’s injections and minutes restriction (mid-March) raise concerns. If he’s limited, Orlando’s physicality (led by Wagner) could steal a game, as seen in their 108-104 win. 

Orlando’s Defense: The Magic’s 2nd-ranked defensive rating (108.2) and league-best three-point defense (fewest attempts allowed) disrupted Boston’s 15-for-73 three-point shooting in two wins. If they replicate this, a Game 3 or 4 upset in Orlando is possible. However, Boston’s 37-6 record when shooting 36.5%+ from three and 26-point win with their full lineup suggest these hurdles are surmountable. 

Ricky's 1* play on MUN.

Key Angle: It's important to remember that Ricky never makes a bet on any game based on just one angle. In order to make the grade, all his premium picks must meet several important criteria. He doesn't share all his secrets within his analysis, instead he chooses to reveal only the angle that he feels is the most significant. Here in this game the recent history of these two teams is particularly significant.

- Manchester United are unbeaten in all of their last 7 home matches in all competitions.

- Wolverhampton have defeated Manchester United in just 1 of their last 13 away meetings in all competitions.

- Manchester United are 3-0-3 in their last 6 home matches.

Verdict: The value is on the Home underdog.

Free Pick on Stars +155

FREE PLAY on Stars +155

1* Free Play on Stars +155

Our selection is on the Minnesota Timberwolves to defeat the Los Angeles Lakers on Saturday at 8:30pm ET for a number of reasons. Here are some of the more important ones.

Minnesota is red hot entering the playoffs -- won eight of L9 games.

The Timberwolves are also 6-3 versus the spread over those L9 games.

Los Angeles has lost five of the L8 games played against Minnesota.

The Lakers do have two superstars. But, Minnesota's got Julius Randle -- he should support Anthony Edwards a lot today.

We think that Minnesota covers the spread tonight.

AAA Sports